
link
here to all persons listed here in
Y-Search
link
here to the lab results in Haplo G
Project
link here to the Sorenson
Y-DNA database
link here to YHRD
database
[search for surname using FTDNA values]
Explanation of this
clade
Please note that all
references to the old terminology for this group have been changed here to
say G2a. Some other locations on the
Internet may still use the old
term, G2.
Although three members of this clade have tested
positive both for G2a as well as the new mutations
U8, U1 and U13, the
exact boundaries of the U13 clade are unclear, and some of the men
below
may only be postive for U8. The U13
mutation seems to be one of the youngest in the G family.
When
these new mutations are added to official G subgroup listings, they would
logically be G2a3a2,
but this is speculative.
It will be noted there is an unusual
concentration of this clade in the German-speaking countries
of
Germany and Switzerland and minimal presence (if any) in Iberia and
Scandinavia. The
spread beyond Germany follows several
migration patterns of Germanic tribes. So one
possibility
is that this clade was intermixed with Germanic
tribes and followed the Saxons, Burgundians and
Lombards in spreading
the clade to France, Italy, eastern Europe and England. Its absence so
far
in Celtic-speaking areas of the British Isles also argues
for a connection to the Saxons, rather
than Romans or
Normans.
There may be a small Jewish or crpyto-Jewish subclade,
but better research and more samples
are needed to confirm
this.
The overwhelmingly Germanic component has
DYS439=12 and DYS442=11
The mostly English component has
DYS439=13 and DYS442=11
The seemingly mostly Italian
component has DYS439=12 and DYS442=12
Additional samples
are needed to confirm this pattern persists with more
samples.
These markers are not particularly
slow. There are significant differences here in slow
markers
DYS393 and DYS449. Unfortunately neither of
these markers is suitable here for designating
subgroups
as those having each found value are geographically mixed and not necessarily
closely
related. Although only two values are
involved at each marker, apparently a reversion to an
original value by some ancestors has occurred at both markers,
muddying the waters.
However, the value of 16 for
slow marker DYS395S1a designates a subgroup of the
English component. Young and Maynor belong to this subgroup.
The mutation rate for this
marker is 1 in 1000
generations, and the mutation is assumed to be relatively recent since
no
one else shares this value. This marker is
only found in the 67-marker panel at Family Tree DNA
lab.
Tims and Horton compose yet another
subgroup. Not only do they have a very rare
value of 7 for marker 459a, but they also have a 29 value for
marker DYS449, a slow marker.
No other G person in this clade shares this DYS449 value. 459a has a
mutation rate of a little
more than once for 1
in 1000 generations, and 449 has a mutation rate of less than 1 in
1000
generations.
The
final subgroup identified consists of Reitter and Andrews who have a 9 value for
slow marker DYS 455. This
is a very slow marker with a mutation rate of about 1 in
5000
generations. Andrews has also developed a very
rate 24 value for YCAIIb -- seemingly by
some
extraordinary mutation event because 21 is the normal upper limits
here.
Persons probably belonging to this clade
May 2007 update
............confirmed members with 37
markers listed on the graph above are in bold
.....................those with fewer than 37 markers who only
seem to belong to the clade are in plain type
| who list origins
in Switzerland Vorster 3EAEN in Y-Search. N17628 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a. Unclear if tested further. Beiler # 2 4V679 in Y-Search. 8320 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a. Unclear if tested further. Confirmed as G2a with U8+, U1+ and U13+ in Garvey study [sample Y-136] . Beiler/Beyeler # 6 HHGJC in Y-Search. Has 37 markers, but not listed in diagram above because exactly same as Beiler # 2. Beyeler # 2 QWK79 in Y-Search. This sample or the next sample is 17934 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a. Beyeler # 1 KVZ5V in Y-Search. (see just above) Boiler/Beyeler APKFW in Y-Search. 45081 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a. Byler/Beyeler 9P7JF in Y-Search. 11903 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a. Beiler # 3 ZEZBR in Y-Search. 8321 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a. Byler/Beyeler # 2 7HQYH in Y-Search. 11903 in G Project. In G project may be instead T9SYX. Only predicted as G2. Byler/Beyeler # 3 T9SYX in Y-Search. (see just above) Boiler/Beyeler # 2 CEEHZ in Y-Search. 45081 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a. An entry in YHRD database taken somewhere in Switzerland. Because of limited number of marker values available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade. |
| who list origins
in Germany Hensarling # 3 Y8X6H in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Hensarling # 1 RGJ2H in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Hensarling # 4 YNY9E in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Has 37 markers but not listed in diagram because this group well-represented. Hensarling # 2 WB8RD in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Heinzerling Q5A8U in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a, but not G2a1 or G2a2. Hencerling 32S3E in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. ONE PERSON IN THE HENSARLING/HEINZERLING GROUP confirmed as G2, not not G2a1 or G2a2. Bopp # 1 C6EX8 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Confirmed by the lab as G2a, but unclear if tested further. Bopp # 2 FU3VX in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed of predicted as G. Though has 37 markers, not included in diagram above because same as Bopp # 1. Brookman FV8PM in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G. His results received too late to include on diagram above, but he clusters closest with the Heinzerling/Bopp node. Frederick/Friedrich HCK94 in Y-Search. 76191 in G Project. Confirmed by the lab as G2a but unclear whether tested further. His full 37 markers available only after chart above created. Stabley/Stabler 53MMM in Y-Search. N3484 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Bischoff Listed in Sorenson database. Not tested for G. Though not 37 markers, it was included because all the existing markers exacting match one clade member. Keeslar apparently not in Y-Search. 50070 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a. Raser/Berkmen VGX6C in Y-Search. 64650 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a, but unclear if tested further. Rummler 4C5S3 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers. Is an exact 12-marker match to many clade members. Schaller A7DMH in Y-Search. N25258 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers. Is an exact 12-marker match to many clade members. Hubert An entry in the Sorenson database. Has not been tested for G. Unrine Apparently not in Y-Search. N30522 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G (M201+). Unclear if tested further. Is borderline for this clade due to having only 12 markers. Beistel Apparently not in Y-Search. N17786 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Is borderline for this clade due to having only 12 markers. He is an exact match to a clade member as well to a person who is not a clade member. Eckard/Eckardt HVH4P in Y-Search. 55298 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Hartman Apparently not in Y-Search. N11396 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G (M201+) but unclear if tested further. Is borderline for this clade due to having only 12 markers. Bergmann NS2WX in Y-Search. N4901 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a but whether predicted or confirmed. Though an exact 12-marker match to Raser, this sample is especially borderline due to absence of more than 12 markers. Albright JCE9B in Y-Search. 82237 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Seiders K8XBE in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted for G. Though he lacks all 37 markers, it is clear he belongs to this clade. Baumgardner Apparently not in Y-Search. 81251 in G Project. Only predicted as G. He is very close genetically to Sipp (below). Results available too late to include on diagram above but would be next to Sipp. An entry in YHRD database taken in Stuttgart. Because of limited number of marker values available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade. About a dozen other YHRD samples with 2 fewer markers may belong to several G clades, including this one. |
| who list origins
in Austria Reitter/Ritter A2QDW in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. His results obtained too late to include in the diagram above. He is close genetically to the Henserling group. |
| who list origins
in England Hopkins ZBN3A in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. ......NOTE: Tims and Horton have an unsual value of 7 for DYS459a Tims E6UCW in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Horton AY5J2 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. The Hortons match Tim exactly at 25 markers. Horton # 2 SUD2W in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Horton # 3 58F8Q in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Horton # 4 7A27B in Y-Search Horton # 5 RTW87 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Horton # 6 UYC9W in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Foster KTF4Z in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Hall # 2 MBVRG in Y-Search. Seems to be 67057 in G Project who has more markers tested. Only predicted as G. Seems same family as Hall # 1 (below) -- unlisted origins. |
| who list origins
in France Griego/L'Archeveque # 1 ZYRUU in Y-Search. 53659 in G Project. Confirmed as G (M201+) by lab, but unclear if tested further. Has origins in s.w. France. Is very close to Nieto (see unknown section) Griego/L'Archeveque # 2 KD6MH in Y-Search. Same haplotype as L'Archeveque # 1 so not included on diagram above. Archibeque/L'Archeveque # 3 W285Q in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G. Closely related to the two Griego samples. Results received too late to include in diagram above. Beno # 1 JRMPR in Y-Search. N45696 in G Project. Lists origins in Alsace, n.e. France. Only predicted as G. Beno # 2 K6W66 in Y-Search. N35543 in G Project. Lists origins in Alsace, n. e. France. Only predicted as G. Lafon Apparently not in Y-Search. N1920 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Bridenbecker BNRRD in Y-Search. N3121 in G Project. Only predicted as G. From Alsace, n. e. France. Erroneously lists Alsace as part of Germany. Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers. Is an exact 12-marker match to many clade members. |
| who list origins
in Holland Van Ert 8KTSR in Y-Search. N43641 in G Project. Although his 12 markers exactly match five of the clade members, he must be considered borderline for the clade until more markers are available. Confirmed by lab as G but not G1, G2a, G2b. If correct, this would disqualify him for this clade, but there have been lab problems in correctly identifying persons some atypical G persons. |
| who list origins
in Portugal An entry in YHRD database taken in northern Portugal. Because of limited number of marker values available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade. |
| who list origins
in Spain Barela BX4YY in Y-Search. N36191 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Is borderline for this clade due to having only 12 markers. Exactly matched Nieto's 12 markers. |
| who list origins
in Italy Spadafora XCZX3 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G project. Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G. Vaillant/Veneziano XSA5A in Y-Search. 27630 in G Project. Confirmed by the lab as G2a, but unclear if tested further. He is an exact 12-marker match to the Pole, Kasnick and peripheral to everyone else. Rainey/Regna BNU3P in Y-Search. 10493 in G Project. Confirmed by the lab as G2a but not G2a1 or G2a2. Peloni A sample in Sorenson database. Has not been tested for G. Petro Apparently not in Y-Search. N2211 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Viri Apparently not in Y-Search. N34286 in G Project. Only predicted as G. |
| who list origins
in Poland Kasnick JTHF8 in Y-Search. 80085 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers. Is an exact 12-marker match to Veneziano. |
| who list origins in Czech
Republic Brabec/Barbetz KA8UN in Y-Search. He was accidentally omitted from the new chart above but connects between Vorster and Beiler. Lists origins in Bohemia. Four entries in YHRD database taken in central Bohemia. Because of limited number of marker values available, these samples must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade. |
| who list origins in the
Ukraine Schueler Listed in Sorenson database. Not tested for G. This is a German surname -- part of the German settlement there?? Though not 37 markers, it was included because all the existing markers exacting match one clade member. |
| who list origins in North Ossetia,
Russia An entry in YHRD database taken in Digora, N. Ossetia. Because of limited number of marker values available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade. This profile is not typical of Ossetian G profiles. CAUTION: this sample could be shared by several clades, and values are not unique to this clade with the limited number of markers available. |
| who list origins
in Turkey Spatola M373J in Y-Search. M50516 in G Project. Lab makes no prediction as to G status. His 12 markers are borderline for inclusion in this clade, especially because of the geographical distance. |
| who have unlisted or undetermined
origins in the Old World Mourad Pereida A8P45 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. First surname (paternal) seems not to be Hispanic though participant has Hispanic given name. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Hagen A56QU in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Seems to have German surname. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Johnson BTDBM in Y-Search. 69805 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers. Is an exact 12-marker match to many clade members. Beiler # 1 A sample listed in the Sorenson database. Apparently related to the Swiss Beilers above. Andrews UFXAM in Y-Search. 68853 in G Project. Possible Swiss ancestry. Only predicted as G. He has a rare value of 24 at marker YCAII which likely represents a bizarre mutation as values for this do not normally extend beyond 21. Sipp Apparently not in Y-Search. 50316 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Is very close genetically to Baumgardner (above). Hill # 2 MSJSY in Y-Search, 29924 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a but not G2a1 or G2a2. Birch 35VRW in Y-Search. Apparently not in G project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Maynor # 2 V53JV in Y-Search. 74129 in G Project. Only predicted as G2. Maynor # 1 P57H3 in Y-Search. 30272 in G Project. Only predicted as G2. Young WST6D in Y-Search. 11234 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a but unclear if tested further. Confirmed as G2a with U8+, U1+ and U13+ in Garvey study . Dobson An entry in the Sorenson database. Has not been tested for G. Nieto S22JA in Y-Search. 86319 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Gay XA79K in Y-Search. 88822 in G Project. Confirmed as G by the lab but unclear if tested further. His 12 markers are borderline for inclusion in this clade. Wirtz Apparently not in Y-Search. 84166 in G Project. Only predicted as G. He upgraded to 37 markers after the diagram at top was drawn. Spencer # 1 QYDXM in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G. Though his 12 markers exactly match one of the clade's members, he is borderline for this clade until more markers are available. He also matches exactly several persons not in the clade. Horton # 7 Q2HJ8 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. Christy EUP5J in Y-Search. 7716 in G Project. Accidentally omitted from the diagram above. He should appear on a branch between Mourad and Nieto. Confirmed as G2a with U8+, U1+ and U13+ in Garvey study. Christy ZBF85 in Y-Search. N43541 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Crowell VTS2M in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G. His 12 markers exactly match a clade member, but these also exactly match someone who does not belong to any clade. He is thus borderline for belonging to this clade. Hall # 1 KSM64 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G. He was accidentally left off diagram above, but would be on the branch next to Sipp. Probably same family as Hall # 2 (English origins) Phibbs TTFUJ in Y-Search. N34379 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a. Rumored Irish origins. Hoffman CRWYP in Y-Search. 80611 in G project. Only predicted as G. His 11,14 values for markers DYS385 are not typical of this clade Bricker UMCAQ in Y-Search. 42218 in G Project. Only predicted as G. Stover # 2 GAC86 in Y-Search. Apparently not in G Project. Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G. Results received too late to include on diagram above but would be part of the Sipp node. Nead A sample in Sorenson database. Not tested for G status. |