Details about the predominant G2a3...
and U8+, U13+... diverse European clade


Return to Main Discussion of G Clades









 


















 





                       link here to all persons listed here in Y-Search              link here to the lab results in Haplo G Project
                       link here to the Sorenson Y-DNA database                link here to YHRD database
                                 [search for surname using FTDNA values]


Explanation of this clade  
  Please note that all references to the old terminology for this group have been changed here to
  say G2a.  Some other locations on the Internet may still use the old term, G2.

 Although three members of this clade have tested positive both for G2a as well as the new mutations
  U8, U1 and U13, the exact boundaries of the U13 clade are unclear, and some of the men below
  may only be postive for U8.  The U13 mutation seems to be one of the youngest in the G family.
  When these new mutations are added to official G subgroup listings, they would logically be G2a3a2,
   but this is speculative.

  It will be noted there is an unusual concentration of this clade in the German-speaking countries
  of Germany and Switzerland and minimal presence (if any) in Iberia and Scandinavia.  The
  spread beyond Germany follows several migration patterns of Germanic tribes.  So one possibility
  is that this clade was intermixed with Germanic tribes and followed the Saxons, Burgundians and
  Lombards in spreading the clade to France, Italy, eastern Europe and England.  Its absence so far 
  in Celtic-speaking areas of the British Isles also argues for a connection to the Saxons, rather
  than Romans or Normans.

  There may be a small Jewish or crpyto-Jewish subclade, but better research and more samples
  are needed to confirm this.

   The overwhelmingly Germanic component has DYS439=12 and DYS442=11
   The mostly English component has DYS439=13 and DYS442=11
   The seemingly mostly Italian component has DYS439=12 and DYS442=12
    Additional samples are needed to confirm this pattern persists with more samples.

    These markers are not particularly slow.  There are significant differences here in slow markers
    DYS393 and DYS449.  Unfortunately neither of these markers is suitable here for designating
    subgroups as those having each found value are geographically mixed and not necessarily closely
    related.  Although only two values are involved at each marker, apparently a reversion to an
    original value by some ancestors has occurred at both markers, muddying the waters.

    However, the value of 16 for slow marker DYS395S1a designates a subgroup of the
    English component.  Young and Maynor belong to this subgroup.  The mutation rate for this
    marker is 1 in 1000 generations, and the mutation is assumed to be relatively recent since no
    one else shares this value.  This marker is only found in the 67-marker panel at Family Tree DNA lab.

    Tims and Horton compose yet another subgroup.  Not only do they have a very rare
     value of 7 for marker 459a, but they also have a 29 value for marker DYS449, a slow marker.  
     No other G person in this clade shares this DYS449 value.  459a has a mutation rate of a little
     more than once for 1 in 1000 generations, and 449 has a mutation rate of less than 1 in 1000
     generations.

    The final subgroup identified consists of Reitter and Andrews who have a 9 value for
     slow marker DYS 455.    This is a very slow marker with a mutation rate of about 1 in 5000
     generations. Andrews has also developed a very rate 24 value for YCAIIb -- seemingly by
     some extraordinary mutation event because 21 is the normal upper limits here. 

Persons probably belonging to this clade    May 2007 update
............confirmed members with 37 markers listed on the graph above are in bold
.....................those with fewer than 37 markers who only seem to belong to the clade are in plain type

who list origins in Switzerland

 Vorster   3EAEN in Y-Search.  N17628 in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G2a.  Unclear if tested further.
 Beiler # 2  4V679 in Y-Search.  8320 in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G2a.  Unclear if tested further.
                           Confirmed as G2a with U8+, U1+ and U13+ in Garvey study [sample Y-136] .
 Beiler/Beyeler # 6  HHGJC in Y-Search.  Has 37 markers, but not listed in diagram above because exactly
             same as Beiler # 2.
  Beyeler # 2  QWK79 in Y-Search.  This sample or the next sample is 17934 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2a.
  Beyeler # 1  KVZ5V in Y-Search.  (see just above)
  Boiler/Beyeler  APKFW in Y-Search.  45081 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2a.
  Byler/Beyeler  9P7JF in Y-Search.  11903 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2a.
  Beiler # 3  ZEZBR in Y-Search.  8321 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2a.
  Byler/Beyeler # 2  7HQYH in Y-Search.  11903 in G Project.  In G project may be instead T9SYX.  
               Only predicted as G2.
  Byler/Beyeler # 3  T9SYX in Y-Search.  (see just above)
  Boiler/Beyeler # 2  CEEHZ in Y-Search.  45081 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2a.
  An entry in YHRD database taken somewhere in Switzerland.  Because of limited number of marker values
           available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade.

who list origins in Germany

 Hensarling # 3  Y8X6H in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Hensarling # 1  RGJ2H in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.  
 Hensarling # 4  YNY9E in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
                     Has 37 markers but not listed in diagram because this group well-represented.
 Hensarling # 2  WB8RD in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G. 
 Heinzerling  Q5A8U in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G2a, but not G2a1 or G2a2.
 Hencerling  32S3E in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
            ONE PERSON IN THE HENSARLING/HEINZERLING GROUP confirmed as G2, not not G2a1 or G2a2.
 Bopp # 1  C6EX8 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Confirmed by the lab as G2a, but unclear if
             tested further.
 Bopp # 2  FU3VX in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed of predicted as G.
                   Though has 37 markers, not included in diagram above because same as Bopp # 1.
 Brookman  FV8PM in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G.
                   His results received too late to include on diagram above, but he clusters closest with the
                   Heinzerling/Bopp node.
 Frederick/Friedrich  HCK94 in Y-Search.  76191 in G Project.  Confirmed by the lab as G2a but unclear
                   whether tested further.  His full 37 markers available only after chart above created.
 Stabley/Stabler  53MMM in Y-Search.  N3484 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
 Bischoff  Listed in Sorenson database.  Not tested for G.  Though not 37 markers, it was included because
                   all the existing markers exacting match one clade member.
 Keeslar  apparently not in Y-Search.  50070 in G Project. Only predicted as G2a.
 Raser/Berkmen  VGX6C in Y-Search.  64650 in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G2a, but unclear if tested further.
 Rummler  4C5S3 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
            Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers.  Is an exact 12-marker match to many clade members.
 Schaller  A7DMH in Y-Search.  N25258 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
            Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers.  Is an exact 12-marker match to many clade members.
  Hubert  An entry in the Sorenson database.  Has not been tested for G.
  Unrine  Apparently not in Y-Search.  N30522 in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G (M201+).  Unclear if tested
              further.  Is borderline for this clade due to having only 12 markers.
  Beistel  Apparently not in Y-Search.  N17786 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
            Is borderline for this clade due to having only 12 markers. He is an exact match to a clade member
            as well to a person who is not a clade member.
  Eckard/Eckardt  HVH4P in Y-Search.  55298 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
  Hartman  Apparently not in Y-Search.  N11396 in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G (M201+) but unclear if tested 
            further.   Is borderline for this clade due to having only 12 markers.
  Bergmann  NS2WX in Y-Search.  N4901 in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G2a but whether predicted or 
            confirmed.
            Though an exact 12-marker match to Raser, this sample is especially borderline due to absence of
            more than 12 markers.
  Albright  JCE9B in Y-Search.  82237 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
  Seiders  K8XBE in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted for G.
             Though he lacks all 37 markers, it is clear he belongs to this clade.
  Baumgardner  Apparently not in Y-Search.  81251 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.  He is
              very close genetically to Sipp (below).  Results available too late to include on diagram above
              but would be next to Sipp.
  An entry in YHRD database taken in Stuttgart.  Because of limited number of marker values
            available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade.  About a dozen other
            YHRD samples with 2 fewer markers may belong to several G clades, including this one.

who list origins in Austria
 Reitter/Ritter  A2QDW in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or
              predicted as G.   His results obtained too late to include in the diagram above.  He is close
              genetically to the Henserling group.

who list origins in England

 Hopkins  ZBN3A in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
......NOTE:  Tims and Horton have an unsual value of 7 for DYS459a
 Tims  E6UCW in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Horton AY5J2 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
                The Hortons match Tim exactly at 25 markers.
 Horton # 2  SUD2W in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Horton # 3  58F8Q in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Horton # 4 7A27B in Y-Search
 Horton # 5  RTW87 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Horton # 6  UYC9W  in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Foster KTF4Z in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Hall # 2  MBVRG in Y-Search.  Seems to be 67057 in G Project who has more markers tested.
           Only predicted as G.  Seems same family as Hall # 1 (below) -- unlisted origins.

who list origins in France

 Griego/L'Archeveque # 1  ZYRUU in Y-Search.  53659 in G Project.  Confirmed as G (M201+) by
              lab, but unclear if tested further.   Has origins in s.w. France.  Is very close to Nieto (see unknown section)
 Griego/L'Archeveque # 2   KD6MH in Y-Search.  Same haplotype as L'Archeveque # 1 so not included
             on diagram above.
 Archibeque/L'Archeveque # 3  W285Q in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether
             predicted or confirmed as G.  Closely related to the two Griego samples.  Results received too late
             to include in diagram above.
 Beno # 1   JRMPR in Y-Search.  N45696 in G Project.  Lists origins in Alsace, n.e. France.  Only predicted as G.
 Beno # 2  K6W66 in Y-Search.  N35543 in G Project.  Lists origins in Alsace, n. e. France.  Only predicted as G.
 Lafon   Apparently not in Y-Search.  N1920 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
 Bridenbecker  BNRRD in Y-Search.  N3121 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.  From Alsace, n. e. France.
             Erroneously lists Alsace as part of Germany.  Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers.  Is an exact
             12-marker match to many clade members.

who list origins in Holland
 Van Ert  8KTSR in Y-Search.  N43641 in G Project.   Although his 12 markers
            exactly match five of the clade members, he must be considered borderline for the clade until
            more markers are available.  Confirmed by lab as G but not G1, G2a, G2b.  If correct, this would
            disqualify him for this clade, but there have been lab problems in correctly identifying persons
            some atypical G persons.

who list origins in Portugal
An entry in YHRD database taken in northern Portugal.  Because of limited number of marker values
           available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade.

who list origins in Spain
 Barela  BX4YY in Y-Search.  N36191 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.  Is borderline for this
           clade due to having only 12 markers.  Exactly matched Nieto's 12 markers.

who list origins in Italy
 Spadafora  XCZX3 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G project.  Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G.
 Vaillant/Veneziano  XSA5A in Y-Search.  27630 in G Project.  Confirmed by the lab as G2a, but unclear
          if tested further.  He is an exact 12-marker match to the Pole, Kasnick and peripheral to everyone else.
 Rainey/Regna  BNU3P in Y-Search.  10493 in G Project.  Confirmed by the lab as G2a but not G2a1 or G2a2.
 Peloni  A sample in Sorenson database.  Has not been tested for G.
 Petro  Apparently not in Y-Search.  N2211 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
 Viri  Apparently not in Y-Search.  N34286 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.

who list origins in Poland
  Kasnick  JTHF8 in Y-Search.  80085 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
            Is borderline for this clade due to only 12 markers.  Is an exact 12-marker match to Veneziano.

who list origins in Czech Republic  
 Brabec/Barbetz
  KA8UN in Y-Search.  He was accidentally omitted from the new chart above
           but connects between Vorster and Beiler.  Lists origins in Bohemia.
 Four entries in YHRD database taken in central Bohemia.  Because of limited number of marker values
           available, these samples must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade.

who list origins in the Ukraine
  Schueler  Listed in Sorenson database.  Not tested for G.  This is a German surname -- part of the German
             settlement there??  Though not 37 markers, it was included because all the existing markers exacting match
             one clade member.
 

who list origins in North Ossetia, Russia
 An entry in YHRD database taken in Digora, N. Ossetia.  Because of limited number of marker values
           available, this sample must be considered borderline for belonging to this clade.  This profile is
           not typical of Ossetian G profiles.  CAUTION:  this sample could be shared by several clades, and
           values are not unique to this clade with the limited number of markers available.

who list origins in Turkey
 Spatola  M373J in Y-Search.  M50516 in G Project.  Lab makes no prediction as to G status.
            His 12 markers are borderline for inclusion in this clade, especially because of the geographical
            distance.

who have unlisted or undetermined origins in the Old World

 Mourad Pereida  A8P45 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  First surname (paternal) seems not
               to be Hispanic though participant has Hispanic given name.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Hagen   A56QU in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.   Seems to have German surname.
             Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Johnson  BTDBM in Y-Search.  69805 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.   Is borderline for this clade
             due to only 12 markers.  Is an exact 12-marker match to many clade members.
 Beiler # 1  A sample listed in the Sorenson database.  Apparently related to the Swiss Beilers above.
 Andrews  UFXAM in Y-Search.  68853 in G Project.  Possible Swiss ancestry.  Only predicted as G.
             He has a rare value of 24 at marker YCAII which likely represents a bizarre mutation as values
             for this do not normally extend beyond 21.
 Sipp  Apparently not in Y-Search.  50316 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.  Is very close genetically to 
              Baumgardner (above).
 Hill # 2   MSJSY in Y-Search,  29924 in G Project.  Confirmed by lab as G2a but not G2a1 or G2a2.
 Birch  35VRW in Y-Search.   Apparently not in G project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Maynor # 2  V53JV in Y-Search.  74129 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2.
 Maynor # 1  P57H3 in Y-Search.  30272 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2.
 Young  WST6D in Y-Search.  11234 in G Project. Confirmed by lab as G2a but unclear if tested further.
           Confirmed as G2a with U8+, U1+ and U13+ in Garvey study .
 Dobson   An entry in the Sorenson database.  Has not been tested for G.
 Nieto  S22JA in Y-Search.  86319 in G Project.  Only predicted as G. 
 Gay XA79K in Y-Search.  88822 in G Project.  Confirmed as G by the lab but unclear if tested
             further.  His 12 markers are borderline for inclusion in this clade.
 Wirtz  Apparently not in Y-Search.  84166 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.  He upgraded to 37
            markers after the diagram at top was drawn.
 Spencer # 1  QYDXM in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G.
           Though his 12 markers exactly match one of the clade's members, he is borderline for this clade until
           more markers are available.  He also matches exactly several persons not in the clade.
 Horton # 7  Q2HJ8 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether confirmed or predicted as G.
 Christy  EUP5J in Y-Search.  7716 in G Project.  Accidentally omitted from the diagram above.  He should
           appear on a branch between Mourad and Nieto. 
           Confirmed as G2a with U8+, U1+ and U13+ in Garvey study.
 Christy  ZBF85 in Y-Search.  N43541 in G Project.   Only predicted as G. 
 Crowell VTS2M in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G.
           His 12 markers exactly match a clade member, but these also exactly match someone
           who does not belong to any clade.  He is thus borderline for belonging to this clade.
 Hall # 1  KSM64 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether predicted or confirmed as G.
           He was accidentally left off diagram above, but would be on the branch next to Sipp.  Probably
           same family as Hall # 2 (English origins)
 Phibbs  TTFUJ in Y-Search.  N34379 in G Project.  Only predicted as G2a.  Rumored Irish origins.
 Hoffman  CRWYP in Y-Search. 80611 in G project.  Only predicted as G.  His 11,14 values for
           markers DYS385 are not typical of this clade 
 Bricker  UMCAQ in Y-Search.  42218 in G Project.  Only predicted as G.
 Stover # 2  GAC86 in Y-Search.  Apparently not in G Project.  Unclear whether predicted or confirmed
           as G.  Results received too late to include on diagram above but would be part of the Sipp node.
 Nead  A sample in Sorenson database.  Not tested for G status.