Oklahoma Freedom & Equality Coalition

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DID NOT STAND UP FOR US.  WE CAN NO LONGER STAND UP FOR THEM.  AND, WE CERTAINLY CANNOT STAND UP FOR THE REPUBLICAN  CHURCH      ----------------         EVERY GAY, BLACK, SENIOR, PRO-CHOICE, ANTI-WAR, UNION MEMBER, POOR PERSON, AND QUESTIONING OR NON-CHRISTIAN PERSON AND THEIR ALLIES CAN CHANGE PARTY REGISTRATION  TO 'INDEPENDENT' COMMENCING NOVEMBER 3, 2004   ---   START TODAY BUILDING A NEW PARTY THAT HAS COURAGE ENOUGH TO CARE AGAIN ABOUT CIVIL RIGHTS  --------   'MORALITY'' IS ONLY A WORD TO THE REPUBLICAN CHURCH AND DEMOCRAT PARTY    ------   INTEGRITY BEGINS WITH YOU AND ME   ----   Campaign to reclaim America  

Home   Toolbox Contents  Intro

 

Guide to writing Letters To Editors

Steps to Writing and Effective Letter-to-the-Editor

 ¨       Be brief. 150-250 words max.

¨       Use language that is easy to understand. Make your arguments clear and concise; they'll have more impact.

 ¨       Avoid personal attacks. Don't make comments that could be considered rude, flip or threatening.

 ¨       Effective letters are usually made up of 3-4 paragraphs, each with a specific purpose and content:

 Paragraph 1: The Proposition
Explain what caused you to write (concern about a community issue, or concern - or thanks for - a specific article, column or editorial; etc.)

 Paragraph 2 (and 3): The Argument
Say what you think and why people should care. Be concise and make your point clearly. Use brief, personal stories when appropriate. If applicable, use quotes from the article/column/editorial you are responding to bolster your argument.

 Paragraph 3 (or 4): The Call to Action/Conclusion
Say what should be done to correct the publication's/author's representation of LGBT people;

OR

 Wrap up with a smart, punchy conclusion that ties your argument back to your proposition.

Write immediately! Use email or fax to ensure your letter is received on time.

  Home   Toolbox Contents  

Example Letter Number 1:

 Dear Editor,

As someone who has lived in Oklahoma all my life, I think I understand the true values of our great state. We care about our families and our work; we are independent and fearless; we contend that people should be left alone as long as people don’t hurt others. But now, the fear by some lawmakers and groups is beginning to permeate throughout our state. In November, voters will be faced with the question of writing discrimination into our state constitution. Some are heralding the vote as “protecting marriage.” I respectfully ask, “From what?”

 Moreover, what some lawmakers and anti-marriage groups don’t seem to understand is that the amendment will hurt real people and their children. No constitutional amendment will wipe away gay and lesbian people from Oklahoma; couples exist and have formed relationships, some for decades. We share homes, children and lives. Voting for this amendment is not a simple opposition to marriage for same-sex couples, but will have overreaching affects on medical benefits, hospital visitation rights, and other contractual agreements between two people that simply want to live in equal peace.

Let’s remember that we are all Oklahomans who want the best for our communities. If we really believe that two adults should be allowed to take care of each other within the confines of their committed relationship, than we should overwhelming vote against the anti-marriage amendment.

 Full Name

City

Example Letter Number 2:

Dear Editor,

 I have lived in Oklahoma City most of my life. I love my family, my work, my neighbors and my church congregation. I am just like many people of this state. Yet, it saddens me to think that some of the very people I have friendships with, are willing to support an amendment to our state constitution that would have devastating effects on my partner and our children.

As a gay person who has built a life here in Oklahoma, I have lived with my partner for XX years. [TELL A PERSONAL STORY THAT HAS IMPACT AND THAT HOW THE INCIDENTS OF MARRIAGE, HOSPITAL VISITATION, ETC., COULD BE AFFECTED BY THE AMENDMENT]

 This amendment is not about protecting marriage. Its intent is to hurt real families like mine. Nor does this issue have anything to do with religion. No church needs to bless any union it does not want to. This is about rights that the government bestows upon couples, including hospital visitation, burial rights, and a whole host of others that help families be more secure.

 I do hope that my friends and co-workers understand how unfair this amendment is and that a vote “no” is the right thing to do for all Oklahomans.

Name

City

 

Return to Top of Page 

 Home   Toolbox Contents   

 

 

For problems or questions regarding this web contact Vernon Jones at  vljones1@cox.net                               Hit Counter people have visited this page
Last updated: November 04, 2004.